Legal Opinion

Century Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1971No. L.A. 29795PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Plaintiff bank recovered judgment upon an indemnity bond

issued to it by defendant insurance company, which appeals. As hereinafter appears, we have concluded that the trial court correctly ruled that a document upon which plaintiff relied in making a loan fell within the bond’s coverage with respect to counterfeited or forged instruments, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Security for a loan of $200,000 made by plaintiff was a document entitled “Treaty of Reinsurance,” assertedly issued by Manhattan Casualty Company and purportedly guaranteeing the loan in the event of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gyler v. Mission InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Harris v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Poland v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API