Century Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
Plaintiff bank recovered judgment upon an indemnity bond
issued to it by defendant insurance company, which appeals. As hereinafter appears, we have concluded that the trial court correctly ruled that a document upon which plaintiff relied in making a loan fell within the bond’s coverage with respect to counterfeited or forged instruments, and that the judgment should be affirmed.
Security for a loan of $200,000 made by plaintiff was a document entitled “Treaty of Reinsurance,” assertedly issued by Manhattan Casualty Company and purportedly guaranteeing the loan in the event of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gyler v. Mission InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Harris v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Poland v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.