Legal Opinion

McReynolds v. Pocahontas Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1951No. 6297_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Appellants, McReynolds, Garay and Ward, along with one Gilmore, instituted suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the Act), against Pocahontas Corporation (hereinafter called the Company), to recover premium pay for hours of labor performed in excess of forty hours a week. Appellants claim premium wages for the following periods : McReynolds, June 7th, 1948, to June 16th, 1950; Garay, June 7th, 1948, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mafizola v. Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Guthrie v. Lady Jane Collieries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Thomas v. County of Fairfax, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  5. Secretary of Labor v. Daylight Dairy Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API