Legal Opinion
Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. Craig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1959No. 16040PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
These cross-appeals involve ten consolidated similar causes of action filed in seven complaints by onetime employees of appellee Far West Engineering Company, a corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Far West), to recover alleged unpaid overtime compensation; an equal amount in liquidated damages; and reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 1 as amended.
Jurisdiction below rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and § 16(b) of the Act. 2 Timely and proper cross-appeals have been taken here. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Recovery was had in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Barbara Jackson v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Michael J. Von Brimer, Co-Executors of the Estate of Joseph W. Von Brimer, Deceased v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.