Mafizola v. Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chief Justice Sims
Affirming.
In this opinion the appellant, Tony Mafizola, will-be referred to as plaintiff and the appellee, Hardy-Burlingham Mining Company, as defendant, which were their respective roles in the trial court.
Mr. Mafizola sued the Company under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U. S. C. A. sec. 201 et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the Act), to recover overtime wages in the sum of $1,110 and a like amount as liquidated damages, and $531 unpaid wages for straight time and a reasonable attorney’s fee.
The answer as amended is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helena Glendale Ferry Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Schmidt v. Emigrant Industrial Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Harrison v. Herzig Building & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Burkhart v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Posey v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- McReynolds v. Pocahontas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023