Town of Wauwatosa v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
It is the first claim of the plaintiff that the answer denied each of the allegations of the complaint in the same words used in the complaint and was thus a negative pregnant; that no issue or issues were raised by such form of denial; that the allegations of the complaint were admitted and the plaintiff was therefore entitled to judgment as prayed for in the complaint. This issue was not raised until after trial, but was submitted to the trial court by way of a motion after trial. If the objection to the answer was valid, and we do not concede that it was, the question should' have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Thompson v. EggenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- State ex rel. Sleeman v. BaxterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Bjelde v. DolanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. La FolletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Henry J. Bagrowski v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., and Third Party v. City of Milwaukee, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- DEBELAK BROS., INC. v. MilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Bagrowski v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
- State ex rel. Cortez v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.