Legal Opinion

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. La Follette

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The genesis of the instant litigation arose when the railroads and the unions exchanged “notices” pertaining to crews and work rules. Negotiations were had without success. A national strike was imminent. A presidential fact-finding commission was appointed. Public Law 88-108 (77 Stat. 132, 45 USCA, sec. 157 (1964 Supp.)) was enacted. Arbitration was ordered with a binding award to be made in respect to the fireman issue and the crew consist of train and engine crews. The job of fireman was eliminated, for the most part; the employment of individuals was to be terminated gradually. The…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API