State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. Walsh
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The three propositions presented on this appeal are:
1. The motion of the plaintiff that the appeal be dismissed because of failure to furnish a bond. This matter is effectively disposed of by the statute itself, sec. 274.26, Stats., which provides that a municipality in taking an appeal need not furnish a bond. The parties the plaintiff sought to coerce by mandamus are town officers and had they any authority to act it would be as officers of the towns. The motion to dismiss is denied.
2. The question is raised as to the propriety of issuing the writ of mandamus. ^ We are of the opinion that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Thompson v. EggenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Bjordal v. Town BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Laforge v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dawson v. Town of JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Whitten v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Fish Creek Park Co. v. Village of BaysideWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Township of Westport v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.