Legal Opinion

Beck v. County of San Mateo

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1984No. A015501PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment by the Superior Court of San Mateo County entered after the sustaining of a general demurrer to appellants’ fourth cause of action without leave to amend and the granting of motions for summary judgment on appellants’ first, second and ninth causes of action. The superior court action was brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 860 et seq., and Government Code section 35005 to challenge the validity of the annexation without election of a part of San Mateo County known as the “Watkins/El Camino” area to the City of Menlo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Curtis v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Friedman v. StadumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. KeenanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Fig Garden Park No. 2 Ass'n v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API