Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Stadum
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1985No. Docket Nos. A016105, A019041PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, Acting P. J.
This is a consolidated appeal from judgments of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained demurrers without leave to amend. We affirm.
Facts
The facts of this case, involving attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of California, may explain why there is such a backlog of civil cases pending in the appellate courts of this state. In 1977 respondent Edward Stadum was representing Maynard Idleman in a personal injury action. (Op. A, at p. 2) At trial, Stadum called as a witness Dr. Peter Neblett, who had treated Idleman’s injuries. (Ibid.) The case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Roger Cleveland Golf Co. v. Krane & Smith, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Silver v. GoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. A-Mark Coin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.