Legal Opinion
Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1993No. A056917PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
Four school districts in the Sacramento area, joined by the Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools (hereafter referred to collectively as School Districts), appeal an order dismissing their first amended petition for writ of mandate and complaint for a validating proceeding against the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (hereafter the Agency), the City of Sacramento (hereafter the City) and City Council of the City of Sacramento (hereafter the City Council), and the County of Sacramento and Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento (hereafter the County).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Emeryville v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. v. MatayoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.