Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 21, 2007No. 140, Sept. Term, 2006PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

The case sub judice presents this Court with the task of determining whether an individual who enters a guilty plea but who does not file an application for leave to appeal challenging the resulting conviction and sentence waives his right to subsequently challenge his conviction and sentence through a petition for a writ of error coram nobis when the individual is not incarcerated or on parole or probation. We shall hold that a presumption that an individual waives his right to file a petition for a writ of error coram nobis arises if the individual, after entering a guilty plea and having…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Rivera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Graves v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API