Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 2015No. 16/15PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

The doctrine of laches, which is both an “affirmative defense” and an “equitable defense[,]” “ ‘applies whe[re] there is an unreasonable delay in the assertion of one [partyj’s rights and that delay results in prejudice to the opposing party.’ ” State Ctr., LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. P’ship, 438 Md. 451, 584, 586, 604, 92 A.3d 400, 480, 491 (2014) (quoting Liddy v. Lamone, 398 Md. 233, 244, 919 A.2d 1276, 1283 (2007)).

We decide: (1) whether, generally, the doctrine of laches may bar the right to seek coram nobis relief, and whether, specifically, the doctrine of laches bars this…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Perez, Ex Parte Alberto GironCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. United States v. Sammy CariolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. Kovacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Leonard Ray Blanton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Ademiluyi v. Md. State Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API