Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 29, 2010No. 1907PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

When an appellate court applies a legal principle in a new way, the retroactivity of such an application almost invariably depends on whether the new application represents simply the *660decanting of old wine in new bottles or the uncorking of a new wine. The Supreme Court announced its decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. _, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 on March 31, 2010. The holding was that if a defense attorney fails to advise a non-citizen client about deportation as a possible consequence of a guilty plea, such failure could represent ineffective assistance of counsel and could…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PobleteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. United States v. OrocioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Barrios-Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Denisyuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API