Morgan v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
We decide here whether, during voir dire for a capital offense, a state trial court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, refuse inquiry into whether a potential juror would automatically impose the death penalty upon conviction of the defendant.
I
The trial of a capital offense in Illinois is conducted in two phases. The defendant must first be convicted of first-degree murder, as defined in Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, ¶ 9-1(a) (Supp. 1990). Illinois law uses the same jury that decided guilt to determine whether the death penalty shall be imposed,1 and upon…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,447 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. TateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
1,442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.