Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1992No. 91-5118PublishedCited by 1,447 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

We decide here whether, during voir dire for a capital offense, a state trial court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, refuse inquiry into whether a potential juror would automatically impose the death penalty upon conviction of the defendant.

I

The trial of a capital offense in Illinois is conducted in two phases. The defendant must first be convicted of first-degree murder, as defined in Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, ¶ 9-1(a) (Supp. 1990). Illinois law uses the same jury that decided guilt to determine whether the death penalty shall be imposed,1 and upon…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,447 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. TateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

1,442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API