State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
In accordance with Maryland Rule 8 — 303(f), we granted Petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari in order to answer the following multi-faceted question:
Did the Court of Special Appeals incorrectly reverse the circuit court’s denial of [Respondent]^ petition for a writ of coram nobis where [Respondent] 1) had waived her coram nobis claims, 2) failed to meet her burden of proving that her guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and 3) was barred from seeking a writ of coram nobis on grounds of laches? [ 1 ]
On the first issue of whether Respondent waived her right to coram…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Corey Woodfolk v. Gary MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Gregory Smith v. Wakefield, LPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Brown, Bottini & Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.