Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 13, 2015No. 47/14PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

In accordance with Maryland Rule 8 — 303(f), we granted Petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari in order to answer the following multi-faceted question:

Did the Court of Special Appeals incorrectly reverse the circuit court’s denial of [Respondent]^ petition for a writ of coram nobis where [Respondent] 1) had waived her coram nobis claims, 2) failed to meet her burden of proving that her guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and 3) was barred from seeking a writ of coram nobis on grounds of laches? [ 1 ]

On the first issue of whether Respondent waived her right to coram…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Corey Woodfolk v. Gary MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Gregory Smith v. Wakefield, LPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Brown, Bottini & Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API