Legal Opinion
California Educational Facilities Authority v. Priest
California Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1974No. S.F. 23148PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Petitioners California Educational Facilities Authority (hereinafter called “the Authority”) and University of the Pacific seek an original writ of mandate to compel respondent state Treasurer to prepare to sell certain bonds authorized by the California Educational Facilities Authority Act (Ed. Code, § 30301 et seq., added by Stats. 1972, ch. 1432, § 1, p. 3127, hereinafter called “the Act”). Respondent declines to take the steps necessary to sell the bonds because serious questions have been raised as to the constitutionality of the Act. We conclude the Act is valid and that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Sands v. Morongo Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.