Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1917No. 2928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Joseph Henry Martin was convicted of robbery, and he appeals. Motion to strike the bill of exceptions denied and judgment affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtFeick, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, was sentenced to the state prison, and appeals.

' The state filed a motion to strike the bill of exceptions upon the ground that it was not served within the time required by our statute and that for that reason the district *348court was without authority to settle and allow the same.

1 "We have frequently held that, unless the proposed bill of exceptions is served and allowed within the time fixed by our statute, or within such an extension of that time as may, on proper application therefor, be fixed by the district court, then that court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. RardinIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Butter v. LamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Smith v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. In Re Yowell's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. State v. CunicoUtah Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API