Legal Opinion

State v. Cunico

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1969No. 11730PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice.

Appellant Fred Cunico and William White were charged with the possession of marijuana. The jury found both of the defendants guilty and Fred Cunico has appealed to this court.

The plaintiff is here claiming he is entitled to a reversal on three grounds. His first ground is that the trial court denied his motion to suppress certain evidence which was obtained by a search of the defendant’s apartment. Secondly, he claims that the trial court misdirected the jury by giving an erroneous instruction. Thirdly, that the trial court at the time of pronouncing sentence took into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LipskyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Reddish v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. DoremusUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Reddish v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. LipskyUtah Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API