Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hanson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1908No. 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by H. A. Smith against Emma ITanson, adminis-tratrix of John Peter Johnson, deceased. Erom a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals;

1Opinion of the CourtSteaup, J.

In 1892 and 1895 John Peter Johnson, since deceased, conveyed to his darighter, Emma Hanson, two parcels of land, one a five-acre tract, the other a ten-acre tract, situate in Salt Lake county. It is claimed by the respondent, who is an attorney at law, that he was employed to commence proceedings in the name of the deceased and for his benefit to cancel the deeds. Such an action was commenced in July, 1900, and thereafter prosecuted by him, which resulted in a judgment canceling the deeds. On appeal the judgment was modified, canceling the deed to the ten-acre tract only. The deceased died…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humes v. O'Bryan & WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. County of Mahaska v. IngallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Clayton v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. German Insurance v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of GilmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. State v. GummerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API