Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by Warnock Insurance Agency against Peterson Real Investment Company. On defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from an adverse judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case upon tbe ground that the appeal was not taken within the time required by section 3301, Comp. Laws 1007, *544which requires an appeal to be taken within, six months from the entry of judgment appealed from. This section has frequently been construed by this court, and it has 1 uniformly held that the time for appeal begins to run from the time the motion for a new trial has been disposed of. The cases are collated in a note to the foregoing section, and need hot be referred to here. When the motion to dismiss in this case was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Satterlee v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Butter v. LamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Robinson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Moulton v. StaatsUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Tooele Improvement Co. v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Coray v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.