State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling Green
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
We must first determine whether mandamus is the proper remedy here.
In State ex rel. Corron v. Wisner (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 160, 163, 54 O.O.2d 281, 283, 267 N.E.2d 308, 310-311, we stated that “[w]here, as here, an action in mandamus does not provide effective relief unless accompanied by an ancillary [preventive] injunction, it would appear that injunction rather than mandamus is the appropriate remedy.” In State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 1, 4, 591 N.E.2d 1186, 1189, we indicated that this is a corollary to the rule established in State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Butler County Children Services Board v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.