Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1992No. 92-16PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The complaint presents three issues for consideration:(1) Whether respondent Taft was required to disqualify those petitions and part-petitions without an executed circulator’s compensation statement and/or required to advise the boards of elections to do so;(2) Whether respondent Taft was required to withhold transmission of the proposed law to the General Assembly until the beginning of the next biennium in January 1993; and(3) Whether the prerequisites for mandamus have been satisfied.

I

Mandamus

A writ of mandamus is an order, in this case to a public officer, to perform an act which the law…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State ex rel. City of Niles v. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. White v. Clinton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Spencer v. East Liverpool Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API