Baker v. Carr
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Per curiam
This action is before the Court upon remand from the Supreme Court following its ruling that federal courts have jurisdiction of actions involving invidious discriminations in the distribution of state legislative seats. Baker et al. v. Carr et al„ 369 U.S. 186, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663. It was specifically held by the Supreme Court (a) that this Court possessed jurisdiction of the subject matter; (b) that a justiciable cause of action was stated upon which plaintiffs would be entitled to appropriate relief, and (c) that the plaintiffs have standing to challenge the Tennessee apportionment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Toombs v. FortsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
- Kidd v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Magraw v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Sims v. FrinkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1962
3Cited by46 opinions
- Frank J. Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Sincock v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- West v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Wright v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Butterworth v. DempseyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.