Legal Opinion
Schoendorf v. U.D. Registry, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 2002No. B146918PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J.
Defendant U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR), is a consumer reporting agency that gathers information about unlawful detainer cases and sells it to landlords and other subscribers. Plaintiff Faye A. Schoendorf, a tenant, filed this action against UDR, alleging that it was providing misleading and incomplete information about her.
UDR moved to strike the complaint under section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which prohibits “strategic lawsuits against public participation,” better known by the acronym SLAPP. The trial court concluded that this action was a meritless attempt to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Salma v. CaponCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.