Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Szal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 20, 2006, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
In 1991, claimant started a trucking and paving company. In 1995, he entered into an arrangement to remove snow from his dentist’s office. Claimant began working for other employers in 1999, filed claims for unemployment insurance benefits in November 2000, December 2001, December 2002, December 2003 and December 2004, and received benefits totaling $27,782.50. Following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of BarberaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of GrimardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of HaseltineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of HotalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of BalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of LoReAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008