Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Grimard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant received unemployment insurance benefits after filing an original claim on May 6, 1991. Thereafter, he performed activities on behalf of a business venture but failed to report these activities to the local unemployment insurance office. Claimant ceased involvement in the business in June 1992. Following a hearing, the Board found that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed, charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and reduced his right to receive future benefits for willfully making a false statement.

Clai…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WithamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re the Claim of RohnkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of De LaurentisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of SzalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. In re the Claim of TrippodiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API