Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hotaling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 18, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

One month prior to losing his job under nondisqualifying conditions, claimant and two friends started a concrete business. According to claimant, he withdrew from this business prior to applying for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Di Maria v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of RangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EcklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SzalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API