Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Bal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peters, J.P
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 21, 2006, which, upon reconsideration, among other things, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Claimant, an actor and model, among other things, did business as Mergent Services in furtherance of his various lines of work. In 2002, the purpose of Mergent Services expanded to include the supplying of air purification devices. He applied for unemployment insurance benefits in June 2001, August…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of BarberaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re BowlbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of NigroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of AntoniouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Casiano (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013