Legal Opinion

Gornstein v. Priver

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1923No. Civ. No. 4251PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages ¡personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through negligence of defendant while plaintiff was a passenger an autotruck owned by defendant and operated by one lis servants. The answer denies the allegation of negliee on defendant’s part and pleads contributory neglice on the part of plaintiff. The case was tried by the rt without a jury. Findings upon all the material issues e in favor of plaintiff and judgment was entered for her irdingly. From that judgment the defendant appeals, defendant, who was engaged in the general transfer busi3 in the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Engel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Shannon v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Lowenthal v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API