Legal Opinion
Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 15, 1960No. Civ. 30869PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNELL, District Judge.
This action is brought to recover treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, for alleged violations of Sections 2 and 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§13 and 13a. Defendant moves for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and supports his motion by alleging (1) that the entire action is barred by the governing statute of limitations, and (2) that the complaint fails to state a claim insofar as it charges a violation of Section 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act.
Since counsel for both parties…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & PipeworksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Bertha Building Corporation v. National Theatres CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1962
- Marc D. Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964