Legal Opinion
Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 1958No. 67PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
Petitioner, alleging that it had been injured by respondent’s sales at unreasonably low prices in violation of § 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act,1 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U. S. C. § 13a, sued the respondent for treble damages and injunc-tive relief under §§4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§ 15, 26. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the private remedies afforded by §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act cannot be based on a violation of § 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act. The Court of Appeals affirmed. *375238 F. 2d 86. We brought the case here, 352 U.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Janich Bros., Inc. v. The American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.