Legal Opinion
Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1964No. 18333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal below, upon the sole ground the statute of limitations had run against The Progress Company on its cause of action against appellees, filed September 28, 1956. The action was for treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15), arising from the alleged violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2). Jurisdiction below rested on Section 1337 of Title 28 United States Code, and rests here on Sections 1291 and 1294(1) of Title 28 United States Code.
It is conceded by appellants that…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilberto Rivera, Nicholas Alberto, Luis Navarro, Jose Garcia, Hector Garcia, Pablo Galindo, Socorro Mendivil, Rogelio Casares v. Joe AnayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
- Girardi v. Gates Rubber Co. Sales Division, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
- Marc D. Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964