Legal Opinion
Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 30, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 20531-WMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action for treble damages under § 4 of the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C.A. § 15], alleging injury to their business proximately resulting from a combination or conspiracy among defendants to exclude and prevent plaintiffs from engaging in the wholesale distribution of gasoline in Southern California, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2]. Federal jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1337.
In addition to denying plaintiffs’ allegations both as to the alleged tortious conduct and the alleged damage, defendants assert…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Samuel GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964