Legal Opinion

Ireland v. Smith

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1938No. Patent Appeal 3983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an interference proceeding, wherein the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding to appellee priority of invention with respect to all the counts, numbered 1 to 13, inclusive.

Count 13 is illustrative and reads as follows: “13. The combination with a timing mechanism comprising a spring-actuated shaft having an eccentric oper-atively connected therewith, and also having a member adap'ted to be actuated by rotation of said shaft to cause it to engage a mechanism to be controlled, of an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Rossiter v. EllisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gordon Gould v. Arthur L. Schawlow and Charles H. TownesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Scharmann v. KasselCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Chandler v. Mock. Mock v. ChandlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API