Scharmann v. Kassel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority to appellee upon the single count in issue, which reads as follows: “The method of regenerating spent catalyst fouled with carbonaceous contaminants in a system wherein the spent catalyst moves continuously through a regeneration zone which comprises, admixing cool regenerated catalyst with the spent catalyst and treating the mixture with a gas containing free oxygen under conditions such .as to cause the combustion of the carbonaceous contaminants.”
T…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Hull v. DavenportCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Ireland v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Draeger v. BradleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Wilson v. ShertsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- John D. Rieser v. William A. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Warren W. Fitzgerald v. ArbibCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.