Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Mock. Mock v. Chandler
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 10, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5911, 5895PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
Appellant .Chandler has appealed here from a decision of the Board of. Interference Examiners of the Patent" Office awarding to appellee Mock priority of- the invention defined by the single count in issue. The interference involved application No. 524,534 filed by the senior party Mock March 1, 1944, and .patent No. 2,485,430 granted to the junior party Chandler October 18, 1949, on an application ■ filed November 17, 1944. The latter embodied claims for new.' and useful improvements in carburetors, and, the. count was copied from claim 11 of the patent, which reads as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Burns v. CurtisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Kruger v. ResnickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Ireland v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Balogh v. CrotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Romey A. Gaiser v. Cyril S. LinderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Melvin D. Hurwitz v. George Shiu Yim PoonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Roensch v. BillnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.