Legal Opinion
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1996No. Civil Action 92-0128-ARR, 91-5056-ARRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Circuit Judge (Sitting by Designation).
In this patent ease, Loral Fairchild Corporation sued numerous Japanese electronics companies for infringement of United States Patents 3,931,674 (the ’674 patent) and 3,896,485 (the ’485 patent). In August 1995, the court severed and stayed all of the non-manufacturing consumer defendants, leaving six core groups of manufacturing defendants — Sony, Sanyo, Toshiba, Hitachi, NEC, and OKI. On October 11, 1995, the court ordered separate trials for each of the six groups of manufacturing defendants and scheduled trial dates for each.
Over the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Rivera v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Loral Fairchild Corporation v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- K & K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.