Legal Opinion

Voysey v. Labisky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1960PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The rule is well established in this state that when it is shown there is a substantial issue of fact, or when the evidence on a material issue is in conflict, or if the inferences to be drawn from credible evidence are doubtful and uncertain, the motion for summary judgment should be denied. Likewise, when there is credible evidence which under any reasonable view will either support or admit of an inference in support or in denial of a claim of either party, it is for the jury to draw the proper inference and not for the court to determine which of two or more permissible inferences should…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Braun v. JewettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. De Bonville v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Stafford v. General Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Elder v. SageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API