Legal Opinion
United States v. Stein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 2006No. SI 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). No. 06 Civ. 5007(LAK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Table of Contents
Facts.239
I. The Advancement Complaint.239
II. Agreements Between KPMG and Certain of the KPMG Defendants.239
A. The Pre-Cnmmal Referral Agreements Between KPMG and Messrs. Greenberg and Wiesner. to w CD
B. The Fee Letters. to O
C. The Post-Fee Letter Agreements. to H
III.The Hasting Action and Related Proceedings to
Discussion CO CO
I.This Court Has Ancillary Jurisdiction to Determine the Claims of the KPMG Defendants for Advancement of Legal Expenses For Defending this Criminal Case.242
II.The KPMG Defendants Are Not Obliged to Arbitrate Their Claims…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Stein v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PfaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.