Legal Opinion
Miller v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 2012No. 2011-0024PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we decide whether appellant, Samuel M. Miller, is entitled to the advancement of expenses from Trumbull Industries, Inc. pursuant to R.C. *4251701.13(E)(5)(a), which governs the advancement of litigation expenses by a corporation to one of its directors. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that appellant is entitled to the advancement of expenses. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause.
Relevant Background
Facts
{¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellee Trumbull Industries, Inc. (“Trumbull”) is an Ohio corporation that sells plumbing supplies.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Howard v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against MollOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Allergia, Inc. v. BouboulisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Schmitt v. SchmittOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Magnus Int'l Grp., Inc. v. Forster, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.