Legal Opinion

Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLC

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2012No. 11CA0766PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HAWTHORNE.

{1 In this adverse possession action, defendant, CAM-Colorado, LLC, appeals those parts of the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Dale K. Bittle and Patricia L. Bit-tle, concluding that Mesa County is an indispensable party concerning CAM-Colorado's claim that three roads are public roads and also denying CAM-Colorado an easement of * necessity. The Bittles cross-appeal the district court's order denying their post-trial C.R.C.P. 59(a) motion to amend the judgment to include a ruling pursuant to C.R.C.P. 15(b) as to whether the Bittles adversely possessed land…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Dierks Lumber & Coal Company, a Corporation v. J. A. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Polk v. Denver District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  2. Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Evanrich v. EvansColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Mordhorst Cleaning v. CardamoneColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API