Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLC
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HAWTHORNE.
{1 In this adverse possession action, defendant, CAM-Colorado, LLC, appeals those parts of the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Dale K. Bittle and Patricia L. Bit-tle, concluding that Mesa County is an indispensable party concerning CAM-Colorado's claim that three roads are public roads and also denying CAM-Colorado an easement of * necessity. The Bittles cross-appeal the district court's order denying their post-trial C.R.C.P. 59(a) motion to amend the judgment to include a ruling pursuant to C.R.C.P. 15(b) as to whether the Bittles adversely possessed land…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Dierks Lumber & Coal Company, a Corporation v. J. A. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Polk v. Denver District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Evanrich v. EvansColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Mordhorst Cleaning v. CardamoneColorado Court of Appeals · 2024