Kroupa v. Kroupa

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal, Marvin Kroupa asserts that the trial court erred in ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over the trust property *209interests of Diane Kroupa and Cheryl Youn-kin when it earlier finalized a settlement agreement. In the alternative, Marvin argues that, even if the court did lack jurisdiction, it erred in vacating only a portion of the settlement agreement. We affirm in all respects.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The Kroupa family is involved in an extensive farming and ranching operation in various South Dakota counties, including Brule. Otto Kroupa and his wife Marie…