Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1999No. 96-2225PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

A single issue is before us: Did the Industrial Commission abuse its discretion in denying, for lack of evidence of a good-faith job search, wage-loss compensation to claimant? Upon review, we find that it did not.

A claimant who seeks wage loss for the earnings differential between the former position of employment and subsequent employment may find the latter subject to scrutiny. This is particularly true where the subsequent job is not a “traditional” full-time job, but is instead a self-employed or part-time position. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Morse (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Vanover v. Emery WorldwideOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Consolidated Freightways v. EngererOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Timken Co. v. KovachOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Rizer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Oldaker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-498 (3-10-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API