Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Vanover v. Emery Worldwide

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1997No. 95-697PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 4123.56(B) reads:

*369“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”

Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) provides:

“In injury claims in which the date of injury * * * is on or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Consolidated Freightways v. EngererOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lawson v. ForgeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Harsch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Tumbleson v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API