Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Vanover v. Emery Worldwide
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1997No. 95-697PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
R.C. 4123.56(B) reads:
*369“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”
Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) provides:
“In injury claims in which the date of injury * * * is on or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Consolidated Freightways v. EngererOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Lawson v. ForgeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Harsch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Tumbleson v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.