Legal Opinion
Hyatt v. City of Milford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 3, 1991No. 9923PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff, a retired city of Milford firefighter, appeals from a judgment rendered for the *195defendant after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issue presented is whether the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by bringing an action under General Statutes § 31-3001 instead of bringing his heart and hypertension claim before the workers’ compensation commissioner. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The undisputed facts are as follows. In January, 1983, the plaintiff, then a Milford firefighter, discovered that he suffered from heart…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Collins v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Second Injury Fund v. LupachinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Zaleta v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Hyatt v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fenton v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n Workers' Compensation TrustConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Gemmell v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.