Schaffer v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing in the above cause was ordered in this court, after decision by the district court of appeal of the second district.
The opinion of the district court of appeal, written by Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey, is adopted as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
The plaintiff as owner of certain street improvement bonds transferred to him by a holder who acquired them from Municipal Securities Company (a corporation), to which the bonds had been issued by the city of Watts, brought this proceeding against the defendant as city treasurer, and applied for a writ of mandate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern California Railway Co. v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Watkinson v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.