Legal Opinion

Mau v. McManaman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1938No. Civ. 6057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Plaintiff, as an heir of Isaiah W. Mc-Manaman, brought this action by virtue of section 581 of the Probate Code to quiet title and to determine adverse interests to certain parcels of land in the county of Los Angeles.

The complaint alleges that the three brothers of plaintiff, fraudulently taking advantage of the weakened mental condition of their father, obtained from him a conveyance of practically his entire estate thereby violating not only the trust imposed by the fiduciary relationship of father and sons but also an express agreement between the father and his children that in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Collette v. SarrasinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Payne v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pailhe v. PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Bohn v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wilson v. StoudamireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Cornitius v. CornitiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API