Legal Opinion

Collette v. Sarrasin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1920No. L. A. No. 5521PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Emmet H. Wilson, G. C. De Garmo and J. Wiseman Macdonald for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, the father and sole heir of Clifford Collette, to have a grant deed from the latter to the defendant, Ms uncle, declared to be a mortgage. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff and defendant appeals. The appellant claims that the property was conveyed to him as a gift. When eight years of age Clifford was brought to California by the defendant and was reared by the uncle, who, when Clifford was twenty-three years old, purchased the land here involved, each taking title to an undivided one-half thereof. Afterward defendant conveyed Ms half to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosseau v. . BleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Herman v. SchlesingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Borum v. FoutsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. GionisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Mize v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API