Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Stoudamire

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1943No. Civ. 14015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint alleges that they are daughters of a decedent, that one of the defendants is the widow of said, decedent, and that these three persons are the only heirs at law; that the decedent owned certain real property described in the complaint, that the plaintiffs own and are entitled to the possession of an undivided two-thirds thereof and that the defendants claim title thereto adversely to the plaintiffs, which claim is without right.

Answer was filed and the case came on regularly for trial. After the first witness was sworn, objection to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Collette v. SarrasinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolfson v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Lathrop v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Carmen Gogue Anderson v. Joaquin v. E. Manibusan (As Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Rivera Gogue, Deceased), Paul v. Gregory and Isabel GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API