Pailhe v. Pailhe

An action by Alfred Paihle, individually, and one by him as administrator, against his brother Rene, were consolidated for trial. In the first mentioned action the court gave judgment for defendant. Plaintiff did not appeal. In; the second action the court decreed that defendant held certain real property and an insurance policy in trust for plaintiff as administrator. Defendant appeals.

Questions Presented

1. Sufficiency of the complaint.

2. Sufficiency of the evidence to show fraud and undue influence.

3. Were grantor’s declarations subsequent to execution of deed admissible?

4. Where the only…